Skip to content

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Seniors care shouldn’t be worsening, but it is

Society has priorities upside down if we aren’t prioritizing seniors’ care, suggests letter writer
20858670_web1_200310-NBU-seniors-care-letter-2_1
Health Minister Adrian Dix listens while Seniors Advocate Isobel Mackenzie speaks at an event, June 2018. (B.C. government)

To the editor,

The news in the March 5 edition seems upside down. The City of Nanaimo tightens home business regulations for the first time in 20 years and, no doubt, to the good. The renowned non-profit food bank program for Nanaimo just keeps getting better.

Meanwhile, senior housing and care firm Retirement Concepts walks off scot-free from what B.C.’s Seniors’ Advocate calls “consistent and persistent non-compliance” with operating regulations. As your article points out, non-profit senior cares surpass direct-care targets by 80,000 hours. For-profit senior care firms fail to deliver 207,000 direct-care hours

The twisted irony is that ‘professional’ senior care services are still not penalized in any way for making out like bandits on the backs of seniors in care. And are they likely to care what our regulators do? Consider this: the Retirement Concepts care homes are owned by one of the many arms of the Chinese government.

Upside down.

John Harris, Nanaimo

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: For-profit seniors care home funding being mismanaged

RELATED: For-profit senior care homes spend less on staff, says advocate


The views and opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the writer and do not reflect the views of Black Press or the Nanaimo News Bulletin. If you have a different view, we encourage you to write to us or contribute to the discussion below.