To the editor,
Re: Take leadership on climate, Letters, Aug. 1.
Rather than continue a serious debate about the many fallacies of climate change, the letter writer drew unfounded sweeping conclusions about myself then baffled us with an absurd warfare analogy.
The letter writer’s reality is as naive as Suzuki’s sensationalism is dangerous. I clearly stated we all need to clean up our acts and I explained briefly the grossly unfair realities of data-fixing, red herrings and false flag globalist initiatives that suggest if Western powers don’t shut down more to emit less, we’re all going to die soon. Meanwhile, shockingly, many times that quota of both pollution and human/child/worker rights violations from China, India and the Third World is of no concern to Kyoto, Paris nor the letter writer?
Maybe he would care if his particular trade or product was sourced offshore to violators of all things who are able to bury us all in the marketplace because the Paris globalists gave them immunity from even coming close to Western standards in industry and human resources. If he tuned out Suzuki and CNN he might see what scientists without political agendas have been saying, or silenced from saying. And maybe then he can explain to my kids why half the stuff they just found in our house was from China and nothing from Canada.
Chris J. Vaughan Griffiths, Nanaimo