Columnist’s eco-views raise questions

Re: B.C. an eco-propaganda playground, B.C. Views, Dec. 8.

To the Editor,

Re: B.C. an eco-propaganda playground, B.C. Views, Dec. 8.

Although I usually try to avoid Tom Fletcher’s syndicated columns, as they make me queasy, I did happen to read his latest contribution.

In it he attacks anyone and everyone who would be so silly-headed as to voice opposition to the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, including the First Nations bands all over B.C. which are opposed to allowing pipeline construction on their ancestral lands.

Fletcher cites findings by ‘independent researcher’ Vivian Krause that scathingly expose a ‘huge money spill’ – that of certain ‘obscure organizations’ such as the Natural Resource Defence Council and the Living Oceans Society receiving funding from U.S.-based foundations (gasp).

Krause’s work is very popular right now among the laissez-faire libertarian pundits.  It’s being ‘parroted’ (to use a favourite word of Fletcher’s) in many places, notably on the website of the ‘Ethical Oil’ promoters.

The ‘Ethical Oil’ site states that it is an ‘independent, non-profit, grassroots organization’ that receives no funding from political parties, although they do gratefully accept donations from corporations, especially those who produce ‘Ethical Oil’ (also known as tar sands oil).

As an interesting side note, that site was started and run until recently by Alykhan Velshi, who formerly worked as director of communications for Conservative Immigration Minister Jason Kenney and is now re-joining the (officially) political fold as a hireling in the PM’s office.

Ethical Oil managed to raise enough money with their ‘grassroots fundraising’ to run slick TV ads, something their supposedly moneyed environmentalist detractors have apparently not been able to do.

One tends to wonder how many billions of dollars have been spent on corporate greenwashing and ‘astroturf’ (read: fake grassroots) organizations over the years, in comparison to the money spent on campaigns in defense of the ecological systems we depend on.

There is (used to be?) a maxim in journalism: follow the money. Asking ‘who stands to benefit from this kind of propaganda/spin/etc.?’ is always a worthwhile and telling question.

It’s something I had to ask about our local astroturf campaign. And I certainly found myself asking it about Fletcher’s opinion piece.

Claire Gilmore

Royston

Just Posted

Province willing to talk with Lantzville about traffic management for Island Highway

Lantzville councillor plans to ask ministry to install traffic time signs on Highway 19

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lack of coverage of Liberals was ‘chauvinism’

There’s a responsibility to report a balanced gender approach to this campaign, says letter writer

Winter preparation underway for mid-Island highways

Drivers reminded to ready vehicles for changing conditions

Bear sightings up significantly in Parksville Qualicum Beach area

Fruit trees number one food attractant, says conservation officer

V.I. Raiders win, wait to find out playoff foe

Raiders defeat Valley Huskers 13-6 in BCFC regular-season finale

Environment Canada issues gale warnings for western Vancouver Island

Gale warnings in effect for most of Vancouver Island and west coast Mainland

BC Ferries crew member taken to hospital after getting struck by bow doors

Two sailings between Horseshoe Bay and Departure Bay were cancelled

Greta Thunberg meets with First Nations chief in Fort McMurray

Thunberg has turned her protest against climate change into a global movement

Canucks hang on for 3-2 win over Rangers in New York

Vancouver scores three times in first period

More beef products recalled due to possible E. coli contamination

The food safety watchdog has been investigating possible E. coli 0157:H7

B.C. VIEWS: How to get the best deal on your ICBC car insurance

ICBC slowly being dragged into the 21st century

Most Read