City officials show contempt for voters with water decisions

Re: Opposition to water projects minimal, Sept. 6.

To the Editor,

Re: Opposition to water projects minimal, Sept. 6.

Recently the people of Nanaimo were asked to approve the borrowing of $22.5 million to fund the new water treatment plant.

Originally, council had voted to take the matter to a referendum in conjunction with the civic election this fall, they reversed that decision in favour of what could be called a phony referendum.

At the end of the 30-day process, only three Nanaimo residents had cast a ‘ballot’ expressing their disapproval of the borrowing question. Sounds like a resounding approval doesn’t it?

Well, that might be the case if Nanaimo residents were aware of the process. The attendance of less than 40 people at the open house speaks to the lack of knowledge or interest the general public had in the whole matter.

But that is exactly the result councillors and city hall management wanted to achieve, which is why the phony referendum was conducted at the height of the summer, when people are actually paying less attention than usual.

The advertisement run in the local papers looked like the small print on the back of a sales agreement, which most of us can’t be bothered reading, so poor turnout is not surprising.

It is unclear why this process is considered to be equal to a proper referendum, but the opportunity exists for elected and non-elected officials to simply use the alternative approval process to keep the public from participating in matters where their opinion is not wanted.

This seems like just another well-crafted tool which can be employed to demonstrate the contempt elected and non-elected officials hold for the voting public.

Jim Taylor