Letters to the Editor

Incinerator proponents leave information gap

To the Editor,

The corporations that want to build an incinerator in Nanaimo to burn Vancouver’s garbage have filled whole pages of our newspapers without printing anything that could help us make an informed decision. Their website is even less insightful.

How much ash is left from the burn? What chemicals does it consist of? Which watershed is it to be dumped in, or are they planning on dumping it in the ocean? Of that dumped in the airshed, what chemicals are they? How large are the particles, especially the metals, and what polymers and benzine chains can we expect? And how much will there be?

They haven’t even provided a cost-benefit study, as to how much power is generated after the amount used in the burning process is deducted along with the wages, infrastructure costs, transport, and bonding for cleanup if a barge flips in our estuary.

Wheelabrator, Urbaser and Seaspan should quit whining and Vancouver should deal with its own waste.

Jim Erkiletian
Nanaimo

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Social policy changes would alleviate poverty
 
Children in poverty: Breakfast programs help children focus on school
 
Library pops for literacy
Hippie science is easy, and wrong
 
Schedule adjustment ‘falls short’
 
Extra half point transit sales tax would apply on alcohol, used cars: province
SS Beaver was a coastal icon
 
Abbeyfield wraps up year with a party
 
On the sidelines: So, when are you having kids?

Community Events, January 2015

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jan 29 edition online now. Browse the archives.