Letters to the Editor

Council had its reasons for opposing Telus plan

To the Editor,

Re: Residents need new cell tower, Editorial, March 6.

Your editorial suggested that all of council had been “swayed by fears that this cell tower would radiate harm” upon residents of the area.

Had you talked to me or reviewed the debate you would have found that I opposed the application because it required a development variance to allow Telus to disturb the wetland next to the tower.

Council’s Advisory Council on Environmental Sustainability has been working on a new policy that if passed would strengthen the restrictions on development along riparian areas in order to protect wildlife. I said clearly at the council meeting that my decision was based on the riparian values of the property and riparian values alone.

I appreciate this opportunity to correct the facts.

Diane Brennan
Nanaimo city councillor

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surrey enforcer killed on the weekend
LNG tax drops in softer gas market
Lions, Gryphons will duel for city soccer championship
RUGBY: Castaway-Wanderers banging way to elite pool
Four clear Dutch Waltz hurdle
Sooke players played like giants in Spartan’s game against Outlaws
Bulldogs add new faces
Sending soccer to Haiti
Generals lose, tie and sign a new head coach

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.