Letters to the Editor

Council had its reasons for opposing Telus plan

To the Editor,

Re: Residents need new cell tower, Editorial, March 6.

Your editorial suggested that all of council had been “swayed by fears that this cell tower would radiate harm” upon residents of the area.

Had you talked to me or reviewed the debate you would have found that I opposed the application because it required a development variance to allow Telus to disturb the wetland next to the tower.

Council’s Advisory Council on Environmental Sustainability has been working on a new policy that if passed would strengthen the restrictions on development along riparian areas in order to protect wildlife. I said clearly at the council meeting that my decision was based on the riparian values of the property and riparian values alone.

I appreciate this opportunity to correct the facts.

Diane Brennan
Nanaimo city councillor

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

VIDEO: Witnesses describe scene at Parliament Hill; Raw footage of Ottawa shootings
 
The fireplace can be the showpiece of your home
 
COLUMN: Twin Peaks’ Kootenay/Boundary connections
Honouring our veterans
 
Farewell Ernie
 
Time for truth in B.C. treaty talks

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.