Letters to the Editor

Council had its reasons for opposing Telus plan

To the Editor,

Re: Residents need new cell tower, Editorial, March 6.

Your editorial suggested that all of council had been “swayed by fears that this cell tower would radiate harm” upon residents of the area.

Had you talked to me or reviewed the debate you would have found that I opposed the application because it required a development variance to allow Telus to disturb the wetland next to the tower.

Council’s Advisory Council on Environmental Sustainability has been working on a new policy that if passed would strengthen the restrictions on development along riparian areas in order to protect wildlife. I said clearly at the council meeting that my decision was based on the riparian values of the property and riparian values alone.

I appreciate this opportunity to correct the facts.

Diane Brennan
Nanaimo city councillor

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Lack of addiction treatment flagged by crime panel
 
#UsedHelps: Connecting Business with Canadian Charities
 
NDP blasts lottery corporation spending
Family of hit-and-run victim makes emotional public appeal w/video
 
Having fun at Hilton Centre
 
2014 Sail Past a success
Grant aims to promote physical literacy for kids
 
Just call TVs Mr. D, Mr. Lucky
 
A unique move to Mission

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 22 edition online now. Browse the archives.