Letters to the Editor

Waste-to-energy plant might be clean, but there’s no need to burn garbage

To the Editor,

Re: Incinerator will dirty city’s clean air, Guest Comment, Jan. 2.

I see no logic in Trevor Greene’s assertion that burnt ash in Cache Creek is the same as ash in the air that we breath. The leftover ash that is landfilled in Cache Creek undoubtedly leaches cadmium since we all used to throw our batteries into the garbage. The proposed incinerator at Duke Point will not be “spewing toxic ash into the air.” Modern incinerators are very clean and have scrubbers and catalytic converters on the smokestacks.

Does this mean that I’m proponent of the project at Duke Point? No, we shouldn’t be burning any garbage. All our garbage can be recycled, every last bit of it. Producing goods from oil and minerals requires lots of energy, but once the goods become trash, burning them destroys those resources forever.

T. Luscher

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Helijet eyes Nanaimo skies
Police await autopsy results of suspicious death investigation
David Gogo takes to the street
Dancers put their best foot forward
MLAs shake fingers in quake exercise
So you want to be a firefighter?
The art of living a dream is hard work
Canada Day in Alberni
Youth digging valley food growing movement

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 14 edition online now. Browse the archives.