Letters to the Editor

Conservatives erode democracy

To the Editor,

Re: Wear-green effort lacks respect, Letters, June 2.

I understand that Jim Corder and I have very different views on patriotism. This is fine as differing views are to be encouraged in a democracy.  What does offend me about his letter is the personal insult in his accusation that I lack an understanding of our parliamentary system.

On the contrary, I understand our parliamentary system very well; well enough that I am deeply concerned about its erosion.

I would like to expand on my statement that Corder took issue with concerning why I don’t believe the Stephen Harper government has a mandate to gut environmental protection.

Much to my chagrin, the environment did not register as an election issue last year.

Despite the Conservatives’ once-held view of openness and transparency, they were not open with Canadians before the election that they planned to repeal and amend environmental legislation and cut programs charged with ensuring a clean environment.

For example, had the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans said on May 1, 2011, what Minister Ashfield said on June 13, 2012: “... the amended Fisheries Act will provide flexibility and establish new tools to authorize deposits of deleterious substances,” I doubt the Conservatives would have gotten the majority they have today.

They certainly wouldn’t have gotten a seat in coastal B.C. that depends on the health of our fisheries rather than the wealth of the oil sands.

Dana Haggarty


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, February 2017

Add an Event