Objection to review unclear
To the Editor,
Re: Efficient operations can withstand core review, Letters, Dec. 27.
Gary Korpan’s letter did an excellent job of presenting an unbiased review of the hoped-for core review.
There are no reasons given for the defeat of the motion – was it the cost? I don’t think so.
There was no problem coming up with $11 million for a new annex, or $3.5 million for a piece of property on the waterfront that may need millions of taxpayers’ dollars to clean up.
What then is the objection to a core review? Are they coming from senior staff?
Taxpayers deserve an answer.
R. Stead
Nanaimo
COMMENTS
Let's keep comments:
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters.
We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.