Objection to review unclear

To the Editor,

Re: Efficient operations can withstand core review, Letters, Dec. 27.

Gary Korpan’s letter did an excellent job of presenting an unbiased review of the hoped-for core review.

There are no reasons given for the defeat of the motion – was it the cost? I don’t think so.

There was no problem coming up with $11 million for a new annex, or $3.5 million for a piece of property on the waterfront that may need millions of taxpayers’ dollars to clean up.

What then is the objection to a core review? Are they coming from senior staff?

Taxpayers deserve an answer.

R. Stead


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, March 2017

Add an Event