Objection to review unclear

To the Editor,

Re: Efficient operations can withstand core review, Letters, Dec. 27.

Gary Korpan’s letter did an excellent job of presenting an unbiased review of the hoped-for core review.

There are no reasons given for the defeat of the motion – was it the cost? I don’t think so.

There was no problem coming up with $11 million for a new annex, or $3.5 million for a piece of property on the waterfront that may need millions of taxpayers’ dollars to clean up.

What then is the objection to a core review? Are they coming from senior staff?

Taxpayers deserve an answer.

R. Stead


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
Virk shuffled to new job after Kwantlen flap
Editorial cartoon, Dec. 18
Editorial cartoon, Dec. 16
Editorial cartoon, Dec. 11
Lack of addiction treatment flagged by crime panel
Family of hit-and-run victim makes emotional public appeal w/video
Coroner confirms body that of missing senior
Local 10-year-old declares the right to a healthy environment

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.