Opinion

EDITORIAL: Better casino rules needed

A guy walks into a casino and buys $20,000 worth of chips with cash – $10 and $20 bills. He plays a couple of quick slots or, perhaps, a hand or two of blackjack, and then cashes out.

It seems everyone except casino operators and the government knows what’s going on. The money is being laundered.

This week the government announced, finally, some measures to combat money laundering at casinos.

Reducing casinos’ use of cash and increasing worker training are among provincial actions announced this week, even though, according to a government press release, the B.C. Lottery Corporation “employs standard and appropriate anti-money-laundering strategies” and the province’s Gaming Policy and Enforcement Branch “has the required level of expertise and is capable of providing oversight related to anti-money laundering and associated criminal activities at gaming facilities.”

The government is now going to push the casinos to make electronic funds “more accessible and attractive to customers, while not discouraging legitimate play.”

Government is also going to push casinos to issue cheques for large payouts and those amounts will be noted whether they actually come from a win.

Fair enough. But wouldn’t it simply be easier to limit the amount of cash a person can use at a casino? Say $100 or $500 even? If you want more, you have to write a personal cheque for it or use your debit card.

The whole idea behind money laundering is to change money without leaving a trail. Force everyone to leave a trail of their money at the casino.

That, however, is not in the cards as it would likely “discourage legitimate play.”

Better to allow a little money laundering than to discourage the fleecing of honest, tax-paying citizens.

– Prince George Free Press

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Editorial cartoon, Dec. 16
 
Editorial cartoon, Dec. 9
 
Medical marijuana users score another win in court
NDP leader plays both sides of the fish farm fence
 
Cross returning to Tzouhalem lookout
 
Black Press announces transactions with Glacier Media
RAW talk about photos
 
EDITORIAL: Road focus must change
 
COLUMN: Ideas for a non-toy Christmas

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 16 edition online now. Browse the archives.